Mutation air dots (adt) with slight unitac-like
effect on the leaf
Gorel, F.L., Berdnikov, V.A. and
Inst.
of Cytology and Gen., Russian Acad. of Sci.
Kosterin,
O.E.
Novosibirsk, Russia
A recessive mutation adt was found in M2 plants after EMS treatment of seeds
of the stock SG. Formally, this mutation can be classified as an aeromaculata
type (1). The most distinct feature of adt
mutants is the numerous tiny grey spots along veins of leaflets and stipules (Fig.
1). In addition to this trait there are many devia-tions from the normal phenotype.
The coloration of wings is very similar to that of the standard (Fig. 2),
the pods are shorter and
wider, and the leaves often (but not always) look like the leaves of the unitac mutant (3) in that the terminal tendril are
replaced by a leaflet (Fig 1). The mutant was used to produce an isogenic line
AIR. Despite resemblance of our mutant to unitac
plants, F1 plants from the cross with the line homozygous for unitac
had wild-type phenotype, and the phenotype segregation pattern in F2
suggested the absence of tight linkage between uni
and adt. The cross of the line AIR (i,
R, Gp, u, Wb, K, S, Dw, Pl, m, St) with the tester line WL1518 (I,
r, gp, Ust, wb, k, s, d, pl, M, st) gave evidence for a linkage
with the locus M (Table 1). The
relatively weak linkage to M and lack
of linkage to St suggests that adt
is located near the upper tip of LG III, although this conclusion should be
considered as preliminary.
Table 1. Joint segregation
data for the loci Adt, M and St
at the linkage group III obtained in F2 of the cross AIR x WL1518.
locus A |
locus
B |
A
B |
A
b |
a
B |
a
b |
N |
Rec.
fract. |
St.
error |
J.
seg. Chi-sq. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adt |
M |
153 |
36 |
31 |
27 |
247 |
32.8 |
3.8 |
17.71 |
Adt |
St |
146 |
46 |
44 |
16 |
252 |
52.0 |
4.6 |
0.2 |
M |
St |
134 |
50 |
51 |
12 |
247 |
43.5 |
5.1 |
1.6 |
1 p<0.0001
Like unitac, adt manifests some antagonism with afila. The leaves of triple homozygotes adt/adt af/af tl/tl found among F2 pants, after crossing
AIR with the line homozygous for a, af,
and tl, are not as strongly ramified as those of af tlw. Rather
the phenotype is more similar to that of unitac
af tlw (Fig 1). We cannot exclude that Adt may be one of the X-factors
with Uni-like function postulated by
Hofer and Ellis (2).
Acknowledgement:
This work was partly supported by
the 'Russian Fund for Fundamental Research', grant No 02-04-494260.
1.
Blixt, S. 1972. Agri Hortique
Genet. 30: 1-293
2. Hofer, J, Ellis, T. J. M. 1998. Trends Plant Sci. 3: 439-444.
3.
Sharma, B. 1972. Pisum Newslett.
4: 50.