Linkage between Brac and Idh on linkage group I of Pisum sativum

 

Hagh Nazari, A. and Sharma, B.                                          Div. of Genetics, Indian Agric. Res. Inst.

                                                                                                                           New Delhi, India

 

      Gottschalk (1) reported the recessive mutation brac, which was induced by mutagenic treatment of seeds. The brac plants produce large bracts on the inflorescence.  Recently, Rozov et al. (2) also isolated a similar mutation in an M2 progeny of an EMS treated SG line.  The mutant plants had large bracts on the inflorescence and open flowers.  Complementation tests revealed that their mutation is allelic to the Gottschalk's brac mutation.  The respective locus, Brac, showed linkage to D on linkage group I.

      A phenotypically similar spontaneous mutation was isolated from variety ‘Hans’ (L 116) in the experimental fields of I.A.R.I., Delhi.  The variety ‘Hans’ itself is a mutant derivative of the old Swedish variety ‘Weitor.’  The mutant line, designated P 1440 (a, I) was crossed with the bractless line P 1297 (A, D) earlier by Dr. Y.C. Kala.  The F1 plants were structurally normal and the peduncles did not have bracts, confirming the recessive nature of this new brac mutation.  The line P 2329 (A, D, brac) was isolated from an F2 population of this cross, which had normal flowers, bracts on peduncles, and the slow allozyme of isocitrate dehydrogenase (Idh).  These results indicate that the genetic elements for flower structure and bract formation, although both appearing in the same mutant, are separable by recombination.  The line P 2329 was crossed with P 1865 (A, d, Brac) having a fast variant at Idh.  The F1 plants were fertile, and their hybridity was confirmed by isozyme assay (codominant expression).  The IDH assay was carried out by the method of Shaw and Prasad (3) using Tris-citrate system at pH 7.1.  The enzyme was extracted from leaves of young seedlings using a 0.5 M Tris-HCl, pH 7.5 extraction buffer containing 0.6% 2-mercaptoethanol.

      The F2 data were analyzed by the computer program CROS, developed by Dr. S.M. Rozov.  Table 1 shows monohybrid and dihybrid segregation for Brac, Idh and D.  Segregation at all loci did not differ significantly from a 3:1 ratio.  The results showed significant linkage between Brac and D (c2L = 11.6; P < 0.001).  The recombination fraction was estimated as 25.6 + 6.1. a similar distance (27.5) was reported by Rozov et al. (2).

 

Table 1. Joint segregation in F2 progeny for the markers brac, D and Idh.

 

Gene A

Gene B

Phase

A/B

A/b

a/B

a/b

Total

Chi-square

Linkage

SE

P0

Locus A

Locus B

joint

brac

D

Rep1

124

54

45

3

226

1.70

0.005

11.6

25.6

6.1

<0.001

brac

Idh

Rep.

119

59

46

2

226

1.70

0.477

16.1

19.8

6.3

<0.0001

 

1Rep. = repulsion phase

Note: Because of codominant inheritance of the isozyme marker, the fast variant has been added to heterozygotes to obtain 3:1 ratio.

 

      The linkage between Brac and Idh was also highly significant (c2. = 16.1; P < 0.0001).  The recombination fraction between these two loci was estimated to be 19.8 + 6.3.  Considering the position of Idh with respect to the D locus in the pea linkage map (4) and our results, the order of these three genes can be proposed as

 

 

 

      The allelism of the spontaneous brac mutation with the brac mutation of Gottschalk (1) and Rozov et al. (2) remains to be confirmed directly by crossing all three strains.

 

 

1.   Gottschalk, W. 1961. Planta 57: 313-330.

2.   Rozov, S.M., Gorel, F.L. and Berdnikov, V.A. 1997. Pisum Genetics 29: 26.

3.   Shaw, C.R. and Prasad, R. 1970. Biochem. Genet. 4: 297-320.

4.   Weeden, N.F., Ellis, T.H.N., Timmerman-Vaughan, G.M., Święcicki, W.K., Rozov, S.M., Rozov, S.M. and Bernikov, V.A. 1998. Pisum Genetics 30: 1-4.