|
||
PNL Volume 21 1989 FEATURES |
||
|
||
BREEDING PEAS FOR RESISTANCE TO SOIL-BORNE
DISEASES
Kraft, John M.
USDA/Agricultural Research Service
Washington State University
Irrigated Agriculture Research and Extension Center
Prosser, WA 99350, USA
The significant yield declines due
to pea diseases prompted the pea industry in the Pacific Northwest to
lobby for an ARS Plant Pathologist/ Breeder position to be established at
Prosser, WA. In 1964, a position was established to control soil-borne
diseases of peas through breeding, chemical, cultural, and biological
means.
In 1966, a pea disease nursery was
established where peas are grown in monoculture. A winter wheat crop
succeeds the pea crop on alternate years. This nursery is now heavily
infested with several soil-borne root pathogens of peas. Soil
fertilization is applied once every five years, based on recommendations
of a commercial testing laboratory. The normal annual rainfall of
approximately 230 mm is supplemented by sprinkler irrigation applied in 4
h sets every 7 days at ca. 13 mm of water/week. The low annual rainfall,
warm temperatures, and sandy loam soil, which dries out quickly, make this
field location ideal for screening candidate lines for root diseases
(Fusarium, Pythium, Aphanomyces root rot, Fusarium wilt race 2), heat and
drought stress.
For all field plot studies we use a
fluted cone planter (ALMCO), with John Deere Max-Emerge double disc
openers, which plants single, double, or 6-row plots. Seed for all plots
is counted using an electronic seed counter and is treated with Captan
prior to planting. Candidate, early generation lines (F3-F5) are evaluated
in 3 m single plot rows with 70-100 seeds/row. Rows are planted on 112 cm centers. In alternate rows,
every third plot is seeded to the control (Dark Skin Perfection = DSP).
Single row plots are only compared with the nearest control plot because
of the variation in soil-borne disease pressure as influenced by
environment and inoculum level (10). A candidate line is considered
resistant when above-ground root disease symptoms (stunting, yellowed, or
dead lower leaves) are absent at flat pod stage and the yield is at least
30 % more than DSP. When stunting occurs, but above-ground symptoms are
not evident, several plants within the test row are uprooted. The more
resistance to uprooting, the less root disease. Single plant selections
are made in heterozygous lines segregating for resistance and phenotype.
It is important not to select individual plants on the ends of rows or to
compare one plot with another that differs significantly in maturity. A
new commercial seed stock of DSP is used each year. More advanced lines
(F5-F9) are planted in 4.6 m, double row plots with 150 seeds/row and 28
cm between rows. All 2-row plots and DSP are replicated three and six
times, respectively. Advanced lines (F7-F9) with desirable horticultural
type are planted in 6-row plots, 6.1 m long. Two hundred seeds/row are
planted and one-half of each of three replicates is harvested for freezing
and taste evaluation tests; the remainder is dried and harvested for seed.
All 6-row plots, including DSP, are replicated four times.
In the winter months, crossing and
disease screening are conducted in the greenhouse and growth chamber. A
crossing program is conducted where the most resistant USDA lines,
germplasm releases from other institutions and selections from tolerant
commercial lines, are intercrossed and the |
||
|
||
|
|||
PNL Volume 21 1989 FEATURES |
83 |
||
|
|||
screening and evaluation
repeated.
Candidate lines are planted into
soil bins (1.5 m x 1.5 m x 0.3 m high) filled with soil artificially
infested with Fusarium solani (Mart.) Sacc. f. sp. pisi
(Jones) Snyd. & Hans., Pythium ultimum Trow, and Aphanomyces
euteiches Drechs. Supplemental light (4 h illumination) is created by
metal halide lamps which produce 1000 ft/c at the soil surface. Greenhouse
temperatures vary from 20-25°C. Twenty seeds are planted per line. Four
replications of DSP are planted in each of four bins. Test plants are
watered when the top 2 cm of soil is dry. Candidate lines are evaluated
for resistance at 3-4 weeks after emergence by carefully digging, washing
the roots, and scoring each plant on a 0-5 scale, where 0 = healthy root
and 5 = a completely rotted root. Plants obviously segregating for
resistance (score a 0-2) in a heterozygous line are transplanted and saved
for seed. Those lines which outyielded DSP by 30 % in the field nursery
and scored a 0-2 in the greenhouse test are . considered resistant to
Fusarium, Pythium, and Aphanomyces root rot.
Specific resistance to Fusarium root
rot, caused by Fusarium solani f. sp. pisi, is determined in
artificially infested soil (40,000 colony forming units/g air dry soil) in
a controlled environment (1). Resistant plants (a 0-2 score) from
segregating populations are saved and grown to produce seed, are increased
and reevaluated. Our resistant and susceptible check varieties for
Fusarium root rot are P.I. 257593 and DSP (1 ), respectively.
Resistance/tolerance to Aphanomyces
root rot is determined in the
greenhouse at 22.25 °C. Test lines,
20 seeds/line, are planted in flats of coarse-grade perlite and 10-day-old
seedlings are inoculated with a zoospore concentration of 3-8 x
105/ml. Zoospore inoculum of A. euteiches is
produced by incubating the fungus in autoclaved pea seed broth (10 g pea
seed/100 ml distilled water) for 7 days in the dark at 22°C. The resultant
mycelial mats are washed in sterile tap water and incubated overnight on
the laboratory bench in a minimal salt solution with filtered air bubbling
in each flask (7 mats/300 ml solution). The resultant zoospore inoculum
concentration is determined with a haemocytometer. Plants are inoculated
by removing them from perlite and dipping the roots in the zoospore
suspension. Inoculated plants are transplanted back into the perlite and
compared with the non-inoculated controls after a 2-week incubation. Any
lines which produce at least 70 % of the fresh plant weight of control
plants of the same line are considered resistant. With th< exception of
a few highly resistant P.I. lines, most inoculated lines will score a 4-5
using the root disease severity scale. Therefore, fresh weights of test
plants are used to determine resistance or susceptibility. As an example,
DSP will score a 4-5 disease severity rating but will average only 40 %
fresh plant weight of the uninoculated control. Our resistant check for
A. euteiches is P.I. 180693, which will exhibit
a
disease severity rating of 0-2 with
most isolates of A. euteiches used and will produce 80 %
fresh weight of the uninoculated control. Candidate lines which survive
the greenhouse test are also evaluated in the field where A.
euteiches is severe. Dr. David Davis, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul,
MN, Dr. Ted Reiling, Green Giant/Pillsbury, Le Sueur, MN, Drs. Don
Hagedorn and Earl Gritton at the Univ. of Wisconsin, Madison, WI, have
cooperated with us the last several years.
Resistance to Fusarium wilt caused
by Fusarium oxysporum Schl. f. sp. pisi (van Hall) Snyd.
& Hans, race 1 (Snyd. & Hans) is determined
under |
|||
|
|||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
84
PNL Volume 21 1989
FEATURES |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
field conditions at Pullman, WA, in
cooperation with Dr. Fred Muehlbauer, who has established a race 1
nursery. Resistance to race 2 Snyd. & Hans., race 5 Hagl. and Kraft,
and race 6 Hagl. and Kraft, is determined in pure culture in the
greenhouse, also in coarse grade perlite by procedures described
previously (8). The differential varieties and germplasm lines used and
their sources are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Fusarium wilt differential
varieties |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
* S = susceptible reaction, R = resistant
reaction
A pedigree-recurrent selection
program is used and was computerized by adapting the MSTAT version-2
program developed and made available by Michigan State University.
Selection for various disease and stress resistance is delayed until the
F4 because of the usual presence of non-additive variance in divergent
crosses. Approximately 2500 separate lines are identified by hybrid number
for: 1) generation; 2) whether bulked or selected; 3) horticultural and
disease resistance attributes; and 4) seed characteristics. The long range
goal of this program is to develop multiple disease resistant/tolerant
germplasm lines in divergent backgrounds. These lines must approach
commercial type and be only a few crosses away from commercial use. It
appears that root disease resistance, excluding Fusarium wilt, is
quantitatively inherited and outcrossing with susceptible parents greatly
reduces the chances of recovering resistant progeny.
We have officially released 20
breeding lines since 1971 which are available upon request
(2,3,4,5,6,9,11). We have an open door policy and advocate the free
exchange of germplasm. We only ask that this be mutual. We encourage
visits to our nursery during the growing season (June 20-July
14). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Kraft, J.M. 1975. Plant Dis. Reptr.
59:1007-1011.
2. Kraft, J.M. 1981. Crop Sci. 21:352-353.
3. Kraft, J.M. 1984. Crop Sci. 24:389.
4. Kraft, J.M. 1988. PNL 20:58.
5. Kraft, J.M. and R.A. Giles. 1976. Crop Sci.
16:126.
6. Kraft, J.M. and R.A. Giles. 1978. Crop Sci.
18:1098. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||
PNL Volume 21 1989 FEATURES |
||
|
||
7. Kraft, J.M. and R.A. Giles. 1978.
Crop Sci. 18:1099.
8. Kraft, J.M. and W.A. Haglund. 1978.
Phytopathology 68:273-275.
9. Kraft, J.M. and J.A. Tuck. 1986.
Crop Sci. 26:1262-1263.
10. Kraft, J.M., D.W. Burke and W.A.
Haglund. 1981. In: Fusarium Diseases: Biology and Taxonomy, Penn. State
Univ. Press, eds. P.E. Nelson, T.A. Toussoun, and R.J. Cook. Pp.
157-168.
11. Kraft, J.M., M.J. Silbernagel and
F.J. Muehlbauer. 1972. Crop
Sci. 12:399.
***** |
||
|
||