|
||
PNL Volume 21 1989 RESEARCH REPORTS
77 |
||
|
||
COMPARATIVE STUDIES OF THE
SPONTANEOUS AND INDUCED VARIABILITY IN CALLUS CULTURES AND RECENERATED
PLANTS OF PEA
Tikhvinskaya, N. S. and S. A. Gostimski
Genetics Department, Moscow State University, Moscow 117234,
USSR
It is supposed that different
mutagens may significantly influence the frequency and spectrum of
mutations in plant tissue culture systems. Evaluation of induced
variability must be considered in relation to soma-clonal variability in
tissue culture (3).
The comparison was made between
spontaneous and X-ray induced variability in long-term callus
cultures and regenerated plants (R0) of pea lines 17-35 and
18-1. The callus lines used in the experiments originated from apices of
plants heterozygous for yellow xantha mutations. In each line the mutant
phenotype was regulated by one nuclear gene. In line 18-1 the mutation was
semidominant and in the heterozygous state caused a light-green colour of
the pea leaves. The use of a marker line allowed us to observe the somatic
mutations which manifested as yellow or twin yellow/dark-green spots or
sectors on the leaves of the plants. The muta tion in line 17-35 was
recessive and somatic mutations could be observed as yellow
sectors.
Callus tissue was cultured on
B5 medium (2) supplemented with NAA (0.1 mg/l) and BAP (0.5
mg/l). The pieces of callus (4-5 mm2) were X-irradiated with
doses of 1, 2.5, 5, 10, and 20 kr (dose rate 1.5 kr/min). After treatment
the callus tissues were transferred to the regenerating medium with 5 mg/l
BAP. Regenerated shoots were placed in tubes on 1/2 B5 medium
where the plants were grown to the flowering stage. We observed
alterations in plant morphology and counted somatic mutant sectors on the
leaves of regenerated plants.
For measurement of the
radiosensitivity of callus the "mitotic index" of the tissue 48 h after
treatment and the "growth factor" were used. The growth factor is defined
as the ratio of final fresh weight of callus : initial weight. It was
shown that doses of 2.5 and 5 kr greatly suppressed cell division in
pea callus. At high X-ray doses of 10 and 20 kr cell division was
completely inhibited and all pieces of callus died within the two weeks
following irradiation. X-rays at 1 kr did not significantly influence callus
growth of either line and the growth factors were close to those for
untreated controls. However, at 2.5 and 5 kr growth was essentially
decreased (Fig. 1). Bud formation in non-irradiated controls and the
1 kr treatment was observed at the end of the-third week on regenerating
medium. Doses of 2.5 and 5 kr significantly inhibited bud
formation in both callus lines 17-35 and 18-1. The average number of
shoots per callus was reduced with the increase in radiation dose (Fig.
2).
The number of altered regenerated
plants increased with the rise in X-ray dose. The character of the
alteratons was the same for the control and irradiated material and
related to plant habit and stem and leaf morphology. In addition, we
observed the appearance of xantha mutants (Table 1). The frequency of
somatic mutant sectors on the leaves of R0 regenerated
plants also increased for both lines with higher X-ray doses (Table 2). In
the non-irradiated control the frequency of mutant
sectors |
||
|
||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
78 |
PNL Volume
21 1989 RESEARCH REPORTS |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
increased
fivefold in comparison with that of plants grown from seeds in field experiments. For all X-ray doses the
incidence of somatic sectors did not exceed the values obtained in
field. The events of mitotic crossingover ,(the origin of twin
spots) were registered only in the untreated control of line
18-1.
Thus we
evaluated the radiosensitivity of callus cultures of two pea lines 17-35 and 18-1. The results show
that morphogenic pea callus lines heterozygous for yellow xantha
mutations were very suitable for the investigation of mutagenic effects induced by
different X-ray doses. The system provided an opportunity to register
homozygous chlorophyll mutations. Alterations among the R0
regenerated plants arose both in the control and at all doses of X-rays. Irradiation
did not change the range of phenotypic variants. We may conclude that
somaclonal variation is possibly not qualitatively different from that
induced by X-rays. The same conclusion was made by Novak et al . (1)
concerning chemical mutagenesis in vitro for maize. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
1. Evola, S. V., F. A. Burr, and B. Burr.
1984. Plant Mol. Biol, (abstract of the Eleventh Aharon
Katzir-Katchalsky Conference), Jerusalem.
2. Gamborg, 0. L., R. A. Miller, and K.
Ojima. 1968. Exp. Cell Res. 50:151-158.
3. Novak, F. J., R. Afza, S. Daskalov, T.
Hermelin, and T. Lucretti. 1986. In: Nuclear Techniques and in
vitro Culture for Plant Improvement. Vienna. pp.
29-33.
4. Novak, F. J., T. Hermelin, S. Daskalov,
and M. Nesticky. 1986. In:
Genetic Manipulation in Plant Breeding. Proc. Int. Symp. (Berlin) 1985. pp.
564-576. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 1.
Percentage of X-ray-induced 'xantha' mutants in regenerated plants of pea lines 18-1 and
17-35. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PNL Volume 21 1989 RESEARCH
REPORTS |
79 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 2. Influence of X-ray doses on the incidence of altered
RQ
regenerated plants and on the
frequency of somatic mutant sectors in lines 18-1 and
17-35. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fig. 1. Influence of the radiation doze on the callus growth
rate of lines 17-35 (square) and 18-1 (circle) in
vitro |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fig. 2. Avarage number of regenerated shoots per X-irradiated
callus of lines 17-35 (empty bars) and 18-1 (filled
bars). |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||