|
|||
16 |
PNL Volume
21 1989 RESEARCH REPORTS |
||
|
|||
STABLE TRANSFORMATION OF PEA
TISSUES AFTER CO-CULTIVATION WITH TWO AGROBACTERIUM TUMEFACIENS
STRAINS1
Filippone, E.
C.S. Miglioramento
Genetico Ortaggi
CNR, Portici, Italy
and P.F. Lurquin
Program in Genetics and Cell Biology
Washington State University, Pullman, USA
DNA transfer in plants is achieved
mainly by direct gene transfer using protoplasts or cells, or by
co-cultivation of plant tissues with Agrobacterium spp. harboring
Ti-plasmid-derived vectors. In both cases plant regeneration is necessary
to obtain transformed plants. As the genus Pisum is difficult to
regenerate in vitro, there is at present a lag in engineering this
genus. To overcome this problem, co-cultivation experiments were tried
using tissues showing the highest morphogenic ability, such as
meristematic tissues and epicotyl embryonic axes, on the basis of the
tissue culture technique and medium already set up by the authors
(2).
Seeds of pea cv. Puget were sown
in vitro in sterile conditions on PO medium (MS salts,
sucrose 10 g/l, agar 7 g/l, pH 5.8) and left to germinate at 24°C under 16
h light/8 h dark in a growth chamber. After three days, germinating
embryos were detached from the cotyledons and cut in three parts: apical
meristem, epicotyl segment and two cotyledonary node buds. These explants
were placed in contact with an overnight culture of Agrobacterium
tumefaciens for about two minutes and they were then transferred on P2
medium (MS salts, vitamins as Gamborg B5, sucrose 20 g/1, BAP 5 mg/l, IBA
1 mg/l, agar 7 g/l, pH 5.8). Two Agrobacterium strains were tested,
both carrying the pGA472 plasmid (1), containing the chimeric
NOS.NPTII.NOS gene which induces resistance to the neomycin antibiotic
group in transformed tissues. The 6044 strain was an A281-derived strain
that is hypervirulent on several solanaceous plants (3); the 6048 strain
is LBA4404, a non-oncogenic derivative of the wild-type strain Ach5,
harboring a Ti plasmid deleted of its T-region leaving the vir-region
intact (4). The co-cultivation stage was two-days long; after that,
explants were washed in P2 liquid medium containing claforan at 500 mg/1,
to stop the bacterial growth, and kanamycin at 100 mg/l, to start the
selection stage. Explants were subsequently dryed between two sterile
paper sheets and left to grow on P2 agarized medium with added antibiotics
as above. Explants were transferred monthly on fresh medium and, after 90
days of culture, transformation was scored on the basis of growing calli.
The presence of the NPTII gene in transformed tissues and its product were
checked, respectively, by dot blot and enzyme assay. The probe for the dot
blot was obtained by labeling the NPTII gene isolated from pABDI (kindly
supplied by J. Paszkowski) with dCT32P. As a positive control,
a line of Nicotiana tabacum transformed cells with the NPTII gene
was used.
As shown in Fig. 1 and Fig. 2, both
the dot blot and enzyme assays successfully demonstrated the stable
integration of the NPTII gene after |
|||
|
|||
Contribution no. 39 from C.S. Miglioramento Genetico Ortaggi,
CNR |
|||
|
|||
|
||
PNL Volume 21 1989 RESEARCH REPORTS
17 |
||
|
||
|
||
Fig. 1. Assay for nptll enzyme
activity in pea transformed calli. The figure shows an autoradiograph of a
dot blot assay of total callus protein. Legend: N. tabacum NT1
strain (negative control, A1-D1; positive control, E1-I1); pea controls
(epicotyl segment, A2; cotyledonary node bud, B2; apical meristem, C2);
pea transformed calli (epicotyl segments, E2-F2; cotyledonary node bud,
G2; apical meristem, I2). |
||
|
||
|
||
Fig. 2. Identification of the
NPTII gene in pea transformed calli. The figure shows a dot blot of callus
DNA. Legend: N. tabacum strain (negati ve control, A2—C2;
positive control, A1-C1); pea control (epicotyl segments, A5-C5); pea
transformed calli (epicotyl segment, A3; cotyledonary node bud,
A4). |
||
|
||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
18 |
PNL Volume
21 1989 RESEARCH REPORTS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
co-cultivation. As reported in
Table 1 , no transformation was found in both control and 6048-treated
explants, whilst the percentage of transformation varied among the
6044-treated explants with the maximum rate in the epicotyl segments. The
efficiency of the 6044 strain could be related to its hypervirulence
phenotype. The significant differences in the rate of transformation among the three
kinds of explants are probably due to differences
in their stage of differentiation.
No regenerants were so far
obtained, due to the co-integration of one genes in pea genome,
that disturb the normal differentiation of new shoots. Other experiments
are now in progress using disarmed hypervirulent Agrobacterium
tumefaciens strains in order to induce normal shoot differentiation
after transformation. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
________________________________
1. An, G. 1986. Plant
Physiol. 81:86-91.
2. Filippone, E. 1985. PNL 17:21.
3. Hood, E.E., G.L. Helmer, R.T.
Fraley, and M.D. Chilton. 1986. J. Bacteriol. 168:1291-1301.
4. Ooms, G., P.J.J. Hooykaas, R.J.M.
Van Veen, P. Van Beelen,
A.J.G. Regensburg-Tuink, and R.A.
Schilperoot. 1982. Plasmid 7: 15-29. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Table 1. Callus formation after
co-cultivation of pea epicotyl segments, cotyledonary node buds and apical
meristems with Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain 6044 and 6048. Data
were scored after three months of culture on P2 medium containing
kanamycin at 100 mg/l. The number and percentage of green calli is shown
in brackets. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Differences between explants significant at the 0.001
level. |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||