|
||
28
PNL Volume 20
1988 RESEARCH
REPORTS |
||
|
||
INTERNODE LENGTH
IN P1SUM: EFFECT OF THE crys/cryc DIFFERENCE
ON RESPONSE TO A DAYLENGTH
EXTENSION WITH INCANDESCENT LIGHT
Murfet, I. C.
Botany Dept., University of
Tasmania
Hobart, Tasmania 7001,
Australia
While
examining the effect of extended daylength on internode length in Pisum lines considerable
variation in response was noted among dwarf lines. In particular, the
dwarf lines 53 (le La crys) and 85
(le La cryc) , which had much
the same internode length in 8 h short days (daylight), differed markedly in their
response to an extended daylength regime consisting of 8 h daylight plus
16 h of incandescent light (3 mkmol m-2 s-1 at pot top).
Line 85 was highly responsive with some in-ternodes increasing in length five-fold.
The internodes of line 53 were also substantially longer in the 24 h
regime but in contrast the maximum response was only a little more
than half that shown by line 85. The response of the (53 x 85) F1 was intermediate
between that of the two parents but much closer to the line 53
habit. The F2 segregated cleanly in 24 h conditions into 3 line
53-type (short internodes, low response): 1 line 85-type (long internodes,
high response). The minority class bred true in F3. Six pure breeding short
selections and 15 long selections, each derived from a different F2
plant, were crossed to line 8 (le
la
cryc) and one 48 seed F2 progeny raised from each cross.
The short selections always
contributed an le La cry3 gamete and the long selections an Le La
cryc gamete. These results indicate the short internode, low
response/long internode, high response difference is associated with the
crys/cryc genetic difference. A night
break failed to trigger an increase in internode length in either
line 53 or line 85 so the effect is not
a true photoperiod response.
In summary,
on an le La background plants with genotype crys
showed a lower response to a
daylength extension with incandescent light than cryc plants, allele
crys was dominant to allele cryc, and crys segregates were clearly shorter than
crys/cryc segregates in 24 h conditions (i.e. segregation was
discrete). In 8 h conditions segregation for
the crys/cryc pair was obscured but
progenv tests indicated that
crys segregates
were, on average, marginally shorter than cryc segregates. These results contrast
with the situation on a le la background where allele
cryc
is dominant to crys and le-la crys plants (slender) are longer than le
la
cryc plants (cryptodwarf) (1,2,4). The effect of the
crys/cryc difference on an le la
background was also
examined using a segregating progeny. The
crys segregates were again less responsive to
extended daylength than cryc segregates in both relative and
absolute terms. Thus the cryptodwarf-/slender difference was clearest in the 8 h
conditions although segregation was discrete in either 8 h or 24 h
conditions. Based on data for lines
representing several other internode length genotypes the
microcryp-todwarf/cryptodwarf and tall/dwarf differences were also more
clearly evident in 8 h than 24 h conditions. In contrast, the very
short internode nana types, e.g.
na (6) or ls (5), were more readily distinguised from
short dwarf (le) lines in 24 h conditions since the nana lines were
less responsive to extended
daylength. Detailed results of this study will be presented elsewhere
(3). |
||
|
||
|
||
PNL Volume 20
1988 RESEARCH REPORTS
29 |
||
|
||
1. De Hann, H. 1927. Genetica
9:481-497.
2. Lamm, R. 1937. Hereditas
23:38-48.
3. Murfet, I. C. 1988. Ann. Bot. (in
press).
4. Rasmusson, J. 1927. Hereditas
10:1-150.
5. Reid, J. B. 1986. Ann. Bot.
57:577-592.
6. Wellensiek, S. J. 1971. PNL
3:46. |
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||