70
PNL Volume 19
1987
RESEARCH REPORTS
A SECOND costata GENE (lum-2) ON CHROMOSOME 3
Swiecicki, W. K. Plant Brooding Station, Wiatrowo, Poland
The chlorophyll gene costata (Lum) was Isolated, described,
named, and localized to chromosome 4 by Monti (1). The mutant was
induced in cv. 'Parvus' alter DES treatment and is characterized
by lighter interveinal leaf tissue; veins are normal green (Fig.
1). Linkage between Lum and Le was calculated as 12.0 + 4.6.
Some costata mutants were also recovered from an experiment
with combined treatment 200rNt + 0.014% NEU of cv. 'Paloma' (2),
one of which was designated Wt l5307. A locus Identity test cross
revealed that the mutant in Wt l5307 is different from Wl. 6011,
the type line for lum, i.e. the F1 plants were normal.
Preliminary linkage studies involved the analysis of an F2
population of 202 plants from the cross Wl. 851 (Blixt's tester-
line) x Wt 15307 (costata mutant). Monogenic inheritance was
shown for the mutant character costata and other marker genes
(Table IA). The dihybrid segregation suggested linkage with St in
chromosome 3 (Cr0=28.6) but not with the B segment (Table IB).
For this reason line Wt l5307 was crossed with WL I288, a tester-
line with b, st, and M markers. The dihybrid segregation (480
F2 plants in 1986) confirmed the results of the ear1ier cross
(Table 2): monogenic segregation for the costata mutant, linkage
with St (32.4 + 4.02) and no linkage with B. Additionally, very
close linkage was found between the costata mutant and M (CrO
= 1.74). A multi-point analysis involving eg. Lap-2 and/or uni
should be performed to establish the order of mutants in the M
region
of chromosome 3.
It is suggested that the symbols lum-1 and lum-2
be applied to the two costata genes located in chromosomes
4 and 3 from Portici and Wiatrowo, respectively.
1. Monti, L. M. 1970. PNL 2:21-22.
2. Swiecicki, W. K. 1984. PNL 16:84-86.
Fig. 1. Costata mutation type.

PNL Volume 19 1987 RESEARCH REPORTS
71
Table 1. Phenotypic distribution in an F2 population from a cross
between Wt 15307 (costata) x WL 851 (testerline).
A. Monohybrid F2 segregation
Chi-square
B
119
b
46
Total
165
(3:1)
0.73
St
142
st
60
202
2.38
Lum2
161
lum2
41
202
2.38
B. Joint segregation of Lum-2 with B and St
Joint Recomb.
B St
94
B st
25
b St
20
b st
26
Total
165
chi-square
20.43
fract.
29.54
S.E.
4.37
B Lum2
95
B lum2
24
b Lum2
34
b lum2
12
165
0.71
54.66
5.52
St Lum2
105
St lum2
37
st Lum2
56
st lum2
4
202
9.44
28.64
6.37
Table 2. Phenotypic distribution in an F2 population segregating for
costata from Wt 15307 (lum-2) x WL 1288 (testerline).
A. Monohybrid F2 segregation
Chi -square
St
350
st
130
Total
480
(3:1)
1.11
M
289
m
71
360
5. 35
Lum2
374
lum2
106
480
2.18
B. Joint segregation of Lum-2 with St and M
St M
202
St m
62
st M
87
st m
9
Total
Joint
chi-square
Re comb.
fract.
S.E.
360
8.96**
34.97
4.55
St Lum
256
St lum
94
st Lum
118
st lum
12
480
17.64**
32.45
4.02
M Lum
287
M lum
2
m Lum

4

m lum
67
360
313.00**
1.74
0.69
*****