PNL Volume 12 1980 RESEARCH REPORTS 3
NEW TECHNIQUES TO SCREEN PEA SEEDLINGS FOR RESISTANCE TO SCLEROTINIA WHITE MOLD
Blanchette, B. L. and D. L. Auld University of Idaho, Moscow, ID U.S.A.
Sclerotinia white mold can be a devastating disease of peas, especially
under irrigated conditions. The causal fungus, Sclerotinia sclerotiorum,
produces hard black structures (sclerotia) which allow the pathogen to survive
in the soil for as long as 10 years. Whenever cool moist periods prevail,
the sclerotia germinate, giving rise to mushroom-like apothecia which form
billions of spores that are disseminated by wind. Pea plants are susceptible
to infection by these spores at all stages of growth. The initial symptoms
are water-soaked lesions which usually occur at the base of the stem. Under
warm humid conditions the lesions expand rapidly, which causes rotting of
the lower leaves and girdling of the stem. Wilting and the death of the plant
usually follow.
Field evaluation of pea genotypes for resistance to S. sclerotiorum
is difficult. The sporadic nature of the disease necessitates numerous
replications to detect significant genotypic differences. The plot size
in Sclerotinia white mold trials must also be great enough to test the effect
of canopy structure on disease avoidance since the microclimate under the
plant canopy can affect the incidence of white mold (2). Because of the
problems encountered in screening under field conditions, several screening
techniques were developed to allow preliminary evaluations for disease resis-
tance in the greenhouse and laboratory.
Breeding lines and plant introductions were screened in greenhouse mist
chambers maintained at approximately 18C and 90% relative humidity (1). Ten
days after planting, the pea seedlings were predisposed by misting for 24
hours. The predisposed plants were inoculated by placing one Sclerotinia-
infested oat kernel in contact with the base of each stem.
Highly significant differences in disease reaction were detected by
visually scoring the length of stem lesions three days after inoculation
(Table 1). The pea variety 'Garfield' was found to be very susceptible to
white mold and was used as the susceptible check in all greenhouse screenings.
Lines with lesions 50% shorter than Garfield were considered resistant. A
winter-hardy pea, ID 89-1 (which was selected from a 'Perfection' x AWP cross),
and several genotypes from a Perfection origin were found to be resistant.
The results of two separate screening trials were highly correlated (r= 0.84)
indicating this method was repeatable. Although most of the 388 plant intro-
ductions tested were susceptible to S. sclerotiorum in the greenhouse, several
lines exhibited a level of resistance equal to that found in Perfection (Table
A faster and simpler technique for testing plants for resistance to
S. sclerotiorum was developed using culture filtrates of the fungus. Flasks
containing a basal salt medium (3) with 1% pectin were inoculated with a
mycelial plug and incubated in a shake culture for six days at room temperature
The mycelium was filtered through cheesecloth and 20 ml of the filtrate placed
in vials. Six cm tall plants were removed from the vermiculite growing media,
washed, and the stem excised just above the seed while immersed in water.
The stem was then placed in the fungus filtrate. The pea genotype ID 89-1
which had been resistant to the fungus in the greenhouse test did not wilt
within 4 hours, whereas the susceptible 'Lilaska' wilted severely in the
same time period (Fig. 1).
4 RESEARCH REPORTS
PNL Volume 12 1980
Table 1. Mean disease severity ratings— of 20 genotypes
of peas evaluated in the greenhouse for seedling
resistance to white mold.
1/ Disease severity rating assigned based on lesion length:
1 = no lesion, 2 = less than 1.0 cm, 3 = 1.1-2.0 cm,
4 = 2.1-3.0 cm, 5 = 3.1-4.0 cm, and 6 = greater than 4.1 cm.
2/ 1 = University of Idaho, 2 = University of Wisconsin,
3 = Washington State University.
3/ Means within a column not followed by the same letter differ
at the 0.05 level of probability by Duncan's new multiple
range test.
PNL Volume 12
1980
RESEARCH REPORTS
5
Fig. 1. Wilted 'Lilaska' pea seedlings (left) compared with non-wilted
ID 89-1 peas (right) in culture filtrate of Sclerotinia
sclerotiorum for five hours.
Fig. 2. Lesion development on 'Garfield' and ID 89-1 pea seedlings
exposed to .85 mg/ml of oxalic acid for ten hours.
6 RESEARCH REPORTS
PNL Volume 12 1980
Table 2. Plant Introductions of peas screened in the greenhouse for
_seedling resistance to white mold._
Genotype
Source
Disease severity
rating 1/
Standard
deviation
ID 89-1
Idaho
1.4
0.65
PI 189171
Netherlands
1.4
0.57
PI 272205
Germany
1.4
0.60
PI 155109
USA
1.7
0.78
PI 262189
Costa Rica
1.7
1.01
PI 263027
France
1.7
0.91
PI 166188
India
1.8
0.95
PI 261622
Spain
1.8
0.94
PI 272191
Germany
1.8
0.87
PI 272209
Germany
1.8
0.85
PI 171813
Turkey
1.9
1.29
PI 179448
Turkey
1.9
0.93
PI 222069
Afghanistan
1.9
0.93
PI 164568
India
2.0
0.95
PI 173058
Turkey
2.0
1.10
PI 173778
Turkey
2.0
1.19
PI 174322
Turkey
2.0
0.96
PI 162910
Argent na
2.1
1.04
PI 167363
Turkey
2.1
1.34
Garfield
Washington
3.4
1.45
LSD - p=0.05
0.7
1/ Disease severity rating based on lesion length as follows: 1= no lesion,
2= less than 1.0 cm, 3= 1.1 to 2.0 cm, 4= 2.1 to 3.0 cm, 5= 3.1 to 4.0 cm,
6= greater than 4.1 cm.
A further simplified technique involved the screening of stem cuttings
in oxalic acid (0.85 mg/ml). Following treatment with oxalic acid for 8 to
10 hours, peas susceptible to S. sclerotiorum developed stem lesions similar
to those observed in the field (Fig. 2). These oxalic acid-induced lesions
were significantly smaller on resistant genotypes such as ID 89-1.
Future studies are planned to screen several pea genotypes in both the
culture filtrate and oxalic acid and to compare these techniques with field
and greenhouse screening tests. Refinement of the laboratory techniques
may permit rapid screening of large numbers of genotypes. Lines showing
resistance in one or more of the rapid tests could be further evaluated in
the field.
1. Blanchette, B. L. and D. L. Auld. 1978. Crop Sci.. 18:977-979.
2. Steadman, J. R. , B. L. Blad, and H. F. Schwartz. 1976. Ann. Rep.
Bean Improv. Coop. 19:78-80.
3. Vega, R. R. and D. J. LeTourneau. 1974. Mycologia 66:256-264.